bksballer89
Most Popular Member
This is a sports forum and sticking up for your team and players are what folks do on sports forum.
That's fine but acting like everyone's opinion is wrong isn't the best way to handle things either
This is a sports forum and sticking up for your team and players are what folks do on sports forum.
Spoken like a true hater. Sorry but Luck is not on Wilsons level just look at stats and YPA not total yards also rating, comp % TD% and INT% Wilson wins every one of those over Suck lmao. Rivers is not a leader he is a crybaby. He has had all kinds of weapons in SD so his numbers should be better but lets look at that will we.
Wilson averages the past two seasons
TD 26 INT 9 Yards per Att. 8.09 Career rating 100.2
Rivers Averages the past two seasons
TD 29 INT 13 yards per Att. 7.54 Career rating 92.3
Rivers had a great season last year but this will not carry over. His time playing at that level is coming to a end. He had a return to his 2008-2010 form and had his best season ever. Do not expect it to happen again. As far as Wilson goes, we have not seen the best out of him yet but even so his numbers are better.
Efficiency is efficiency.
We have pointed out numerous time that the Seahawks had statistically one of the very worst offensive lines in the league last year. This notion that you have to make excuses for Luck, or any other QB for why their numbers are worse is ludicrous. Seattle does have a top flight running game, but third and long is the same on every team whether they can run it or not. Everyone knows a pass is coming. When that happened Wilson delivered incredibly well despite collapsing pockets and running for his life while trying to complete the play.
Weapons? I can name a dozen teams with a better receiving corp.
Wilson overall has the best stats over the first two years of any active QB and I'm not aware of any QB in history better. That, despite having a garbage Online and average receivers.
Is he a top 3 QB right now? No. He hasn't been in the league long enough to put him up there. To deny what he has done and the situation he did it in says you only saw highlights and didn't actually watch him play. That, or you are a football retard. Only two options.
That's fine but acting like everyone's opinion is wrong isn't the best way to handle things either
Why is it such a big deal if other fans doesn't agree with Seahawks fans on your QB?
Blaming luck for completing a lower percent of his more passes is every but as absurd as blaming Wilson for not having as many passing yards in less passes. How frequently you throw the ball massively effects your numbers with identical quality of play.
Why is it such a big deal if other fans doesn't agree with Seahawks fans on your QB?
Blaming luck for completing a lower percent of his more passes is every but as absurd as blaming Wilson for not having as many passing yards in less passes. How frequently you throw the ball massively effects your numbers with identical quality of play.
Another "so-called" expert has Russell Wilson tied for 8th with Matt Ryan, Tony Romo, and Eli Manning
http://www.sportshoopla.com/forums/...52-espns-mike-sandos-starting-qb-ranking.html
I have no problem with Sando's rankings other than putting Romo in a tie for eigth. I do think Wilson nust needs another good season and we'll see him in the top 5.
Blaming luck for completing a lower percent of his more passes is every but as absurd as blaming Wilson for not having as many passing yards in less passes. How frequently you throw the ball massively effects your numbers with identical quality of play.
Boston, and all Boston teams and fans suck.
Blaming luck for completing a lower percent of his more passes is every but as absurd as blaming Wilson for not having as many passing yards in less passes. How frequently you throw the ball massively effects your numbers with identical quality of play.