DeafOranguntan
Well-Known Member
That's only for 2019. The article 247 did, last week. Showed a 4 year span. I think UO, made the Top 10??
But Bama and OSU ruled, with Clemson, LSU and OU following. If I remember right, OU and LSU, tied
How does that work?
Recruiting Rankings (Using 247 rankings)
2016 : Bama - #1 OSU - #4 Clemson - #11
2017 : Bama -#1 OSU - #2 Clemson - #16
2018 : Bama - #5 OSU - #2 Clemson - #7
2019 : Bama - #1 OSU - #14 Clemson - #10
End of Season Rankings
2016 : Bama - #2 OSU - #6 Clemson - #1
2017 : Bama -#1 OSU - #5 Clemson - #4
2018 : Bama - #2 OSU - #3 Clemson - #1
2019 : Bama - #8 OSU - #3 Clemson - #2
So, in the last four years, Bama has averaged the #2 recruiting class and had the #3.25 average final ranking (one title) (52-5 total record). Ohio State averaged the #5.5 recruiting class and had the #4.25 final ranking (no title) (49-6 total record). Clemson averaged the #11 recruiting class but the #2 average final ranking (two titles) (55-4 total record).
There's literally no metric from which you can say Bama and Ohio State were better at utilizing talent than Clemson. In fact, you can say both Alabama and Ohio State are bad at utilizing talent, although they win, they regularly underperform their recruiting rankings.