It's an unbelievable privilege to have a full-ride scholarship to a school and all you have to do is appreciate it.
Fuck you. The article literally quotes the other guy saying he got hit in the head with the bottle. The cop is quoted as saying those two were the only two fighting once it broke up. You're either an idiot who can't connect the dots or are purposefully ignoring the fact to supplement your created reality.
That's fine. I don't necessarily have a problem with that opinion. But you didn't answer the question, is it immoral to think both these kids deserved a second chance (because that's what's being accused of me). That's why I'm taking offense. Because I think once the criminal punishments were handed out, the schools and programs could help these kids stay on the right path.
So what you're telling me is that them yelling at each other after the cops arrived retroactively caused the 50 person bar brawl that was well in full swing before the cops even arrived?
The quote says the other guy told the police that a your player hit him with a bottle; the cosp didn't see that happen. Which means it happened before cops arrived and saw the two yelling at each other.
My reading comprehension? I asked a question you didn't answer and then told me I didn't read your answer. The question was not your opinion on it, the question was -- is it immoral to think they deserve a second chance.
"But you didn't anser the question"
Your reading comprehension skills are lacky. What do you think I meant when I clearly said- If they fuck up throw them out. No exceptions?
I answered your question. You just didn't like my response.
I'm telling you there were 50 people involved in a massive bar brawl that happened well before the cops arrived, as they even noted that upon arrival it was total mayhem. The only reason those two got arrested is because they continued to go after each other when the police told them to disperse. That does not indicate whatsoever what actually caused the 50 person bar brawl. Not only are you scum, but you're also an illiterate dumbass. Wow.
They were the only people charged. You don't think the cops asked witnesses what happened? COME ON man. We know your player hit the guy with a bottle. We know the two guys were the only ones who didn't stop fighting when cops arrived. This isn't a hard equation.
And yet, that by no means says Sprinkle started the fight, as desperately as you want it to be true. It means they were two of the 50 people fighting each other during the fight before the cops came, and it means they were two of the three people arrested once the cops arrived because they didn't disperse. In no way, whatsoever, under any circumstances, does that mean Sprinkle STARTED the entire fight. And again, he doesn't control the actions of 49 other people. He's responsible for his actions, not everyone else's. The fact that you tried to pin the girl getting hit with a chair on him just because he was 1 of 50 people fighting proves you simply have an ax to grind but don't know what you're talking about.
If that guy wasn't affiliated with the program and if it didn't unhinge the point you were trying to make in 20 pages of thread, you'd have no problem coming to the same conclusion I am. Even if they didn't throw the chair, the fight they caused ultimately resulted in her getting knocked out by a chair. If another crime happens while you're committing a crime, you're ultimately responsible.
LOL no it wouldn't. The fact that you think a 50 person bar brawl was caused by 1 person for the sole reason that he continued yelling at a guy when the police arrived is absolutely fucking ridiculous. Literally nothing, whatsoever, supports that theory. Maybe you can explain without just saying "we all know". How do you "know" that Sprinkle started the 50 person bar brawl simply because he continued yelling at a guy after the cops came?
But we can think the actions of the schools can be different without one of us having an immoral opinion.
I think it's very obvious his reading comprehension is extremely flawed if he reads an article that says two men yelled at each other after cops arrived to a 50 person brawl and somehow surmises beyond a doubt that one of those men (the Buckeye player, oddly enough) started the entire 50 person brawl. With the only rationale being that he yelled at the guy, who was also yelling at him, after cops arrived.
Except multiple things support it. They were the only two arrested. They were the only two who continue fighting. And the quotes suggest it started by the other guy getting hit with a bottle. No quote, no observation, no witness suggests anything other than those two starting it.
They were arrested for not dispersing you fucking moron. If they would've dispersed they would've not gotten arrested, like nearly every other person involved.
But they didn't because they started the fight and were the only two truly involved in it. The other people stopped because they didn't have the initial motivation. That's how these fucking fights happen. There's a reason they didn't stop like everyone else.
