1) MACK is an exceptional CEO, fundraiser, and recruiter, possibly one of the best in history at that part.
He does not lose that skill with age He faked the old man folksy "aw shucks" charisma even when he was 40 years old.
Getting older might help him even more since his whole schtick was being a loveable grandpa from the heartland.
Boosters will love that act. And recruits will as well.
Mack's biggest problem is going to be he's coming into a completely different situation in Chapel Hill than he faced the last time.
When Mack had his success at UNC the first go round he was dealing an entirely different landscape than what he's facing now.
Clemson was lead by Ken Hatfield and Tommy West and neither put a priority on recruiting. Now Clemson recruits at an elite level.
Tennessee was dealing with the transition from Majors to Fulmer. Tennessee has a staff that understands recruiting.
South Carolina was led by Sparky Woods and then Brad Scott, who turned his focus more towards his familiar Florida recruiting ties and away from NC. South Carolina has redirected it's attention more towards NC since, first under Spurrier and continued under Muschamp.
Totally different situation now, and unlike Texas he'll be trying to recruit to a school that isn't the first option of many elite NC football players.
Mack's biggest problem is going to be he's coming into a completely different situation in Chapel Hill than he faced the last time.
When Mack had his success at UNC the first go round he was dealing an entirely different landscape than what he's facing now.
Clemson was lead by Ken Hatfield and Tommy West and neither put a priority on recruiting. Now Clemson recruits at an elite level.
Tennessee was dealing with the transition from Majors to Fulmer. Tennessee has a staff that understands recruiting.
South Carolina was led by Sparky Woods and then Brad Scott, who turned his focus more towards his familiar Florida recruiting ties and away from NC. South Carolina has redirected it's attention more towards NC since, first under Spurrier and continued under Muschamp.
Totally different situation now, and unlike Texas he'll be trying to recruit to a school that isn't the first option of many elite NC football players.
I think he is a good hire to get the program to mid tier / respectable level in the Coastal. I don't see them competing year in and year out for ACC Championships.
I would agree, if he also found ECU-level OCs (circa 2013) then that would really be the icing on their cake. I am HOPING that to stay ahead of the curve, we drop our OC and try and snag a good up and coming OC at VT. Otherwise, we may be settling ourselves back more than some of the other Coastal teams.Bingo. And if he gets them respectable in the Coastal it improves recruiting and gives us the opportunity to hire a coach that can build on that. Right now there's no long term option out there, so I believe Mack Brown for a short term is legitimately the best option for the long run.
Clemson, South Carolina and Tennessee aren't all that active in NC right now.
During the past two recruiting cycles, Clemson has picked up two elite guys from NC (looking like Couch this year and Henry last year)
Wake (2) has as many commitments from top 20 NC players this year as South Carolina and Tennessee do collectively (1 each)
South Carolina had 2 commitments from top 20 NC players in '18, Tennessee didn't have any but UT also had a coaching change. As I noted above, UT either flopped in NC this year or didn't try
NC State and Virginia Tech have made the most of the top players from NC the past two cycles
i'm not sure about the Brown hire, but I think beating State and VT for recruits is definitely manageable
The thing is Clemson gets who they want the vast majority of the time. We wanted KJ Henry, we got him. We wanted Justin Foster, we got him. We wanted Dexter Lawrence, we got him. The NC talent pool isn't as top heavy this year as years past, but it might be deeper.
yeah, but the past two cycles says that Clemson doesn't want a lot of the talent in NC
that would work in UNC's favor
Thing is....we might not be looking for talent there this year but we are still hitting the NC high schools on a regular basis for when there is talent there worth looking for. Dabo & company ain't stupid. Sadly neither is Muschamp & Co in Columbia. South Carolina saw what happens when you neglect recruiting in the tail end of the Spurrier years. They aren't about to repeat that mistake.
I ain't a Mack fan but you may very well be right. Last year the popular thinking was "The game has passed Herm Edwards by" wasn't it?Makes perfect since. He was, to my opinion, the best football coach in the school's modern history. Why not bring him back? They don't really need to win 10 games a season, he can get them at least to 7-5 with some bowl appearances.
Yeah, yeah, I can hear all the "game passed him by" comments. Again, it's North Carolina. Who else wants to come there to coach football? This is a solid hire for that program.
That is the scuttlebutt in Lubbock.Kingsbury will be an NFL OC next season, no way he follows mack to a basketball school. I'd expect Mack to bring in Greg Davis, get the band back together.
Clemson, South Carolina and Tennessee aren't all that active in NC right now.
During the past two recruiting cycles, Clemson has picked up two elite guys from NC (looking like Couch this year and Henry last year)
Wake (2) has as many commitments from top 20 NC players this year as South Carolina and Tennessee do collectively (1 each)
South Carolina had 2 commitments from top 20 NC players in '18, Tennessee didn't have any but UT also had a coaching change. As I noted above, UT either flopped in NC this year or didn't try
NC State and Virginia Tech have made the most of the top players from NC the past two cycles
i'm not sure about the Brown hire, but I think beating State and VT for recruits is definitely manageable