- Thread starter
- #1
Lake Shore Drive
Your retarted
Matt Nagy defends Cam Meredith decision, says Bears' WR depth 'could improve'
Judging by the Sun Times article, there is a not-so-subtle hint from Nagy that WR is on the agenda for this draft. Of course, that's assuming there's no rope-a-dope going on here. Pace is a fan of this tactic and I'm sure the two of them have discussed it. Throw the hounds off the scent, so to speak.
But assuming we will take wideout at some point, the killer issue then becomes which round. I'm presently finalizing two mocks (one for Nelson as #1, the other if he's already gone), and regardless of this latest article, no WR gets taken earlier than the 4th in either of mine. But I also can't concede that maybe a 2nd rounder is in the cards. I think in order for this to happen tho is only if the Bears have to go D with their 1st pick because Nelson had previously been taken. If we take Nelson, then a WR, that means the D won't get touched until Rd 4 at the earliest. It has been speculated here and there by the media that part of the reason Fangio stayed on was because his side of the ball was going to benefit from this draft. To me that reads as at least one gets picked in either of the first two rounds.
So let's hear from you armchair GMs as to which WR should be chosen at #39, that is if you think that's a solid possibility. I know Noon has even suggested if we trade down to the back end of the draft, maybe even using our #1. So come up with your own suggestions. Since I'm buying into the rope-a-dope in these interviews, I'm not gonna bother anticipating a second rounder. But I'd love to know who you guys think will be there at 39. Let's go, let's talk some pre-draft strategy.
Judging by the Sun Times article, there is a not-so-subtle hint from Nagy that WR is on the agenda for this draft. Of course, that's assuming there's no rope-a-dope going on here. Pace is a fan of this tactic and I'm sure the two of them have discussed it. Throw the hounds off the scent, so to speak.
But assuming we will take wideout at some point, the killer issue then becomes which round. I'm presently finalizing two mocks (one for Nelson as #1, the other if he's already gone), and regardless of this latest article, no WR gets taken earlier than the 4th in either of mine. But I also can't concede that maybe a 2nd rounder is in the cards. I think in order for this to happen tho is only if the Bears have to go D with their 1st pick because Nelson had previously been taken. If we take Nelson, then a WR, that means the D won't get touched until Rd 4 at the earliest. It has been speculated here and there by the media that part of the reason Fangio stayed on was because his side of the ball was going to benefit from this draft. To me that reads as at least one gets picked in either of the first two rounds.
So let's hear from you armchair GMs as to which WR should be chosen at #39, that is if you think that's a solid possibility. I know Noon has even suggested if we trade down to the back end of the draft, maybe even using our #1. So come up with your own suggestions. Since I'm buying into the rope-a-dope in these interviews, I'm not gonna bother anticipating a second rounder. But I'd love to know who you guys think will be there at 39. Let's go, let's talk some pre-draft strategy.